The application of the Human Rights Act 1998 (ECHR) in the workplace, particularly Article 8 (Privacy/Family Life) and Article 9 (Religion/Belief).
-
Cossey v United Kingdom (1991) 13 EHRR 622; [1990] ECHR 21 [judgment]
R. Ryssdal (President), J. Cremona, Thór Vilhjálmsson, D. Bindschedler-Robert, F. Gölcüklü, F. Matscher, L.-E. Pettiti, B. Walsh, Sir Vincent Evans, R. Macdonald, C. Russo, R. Bernhardt, A. Spielmann, S.K. Martens, E. Palm, I. Foighel, R. Pekkanen, J.M. Morenilla Rodriguez
13 EHRR 622 - Human Rights; trans rights; earlier ECHR case upholding the biological test for sex (later overturned by Goodwin).
-
X Y and Z v United Kingdom App No 21830/93; (1997) 24 EHRR 143 [judgment]
R. Ryssdal (President), R. Bernhardt, Thór Vilhjálmsson, F. Matscher, L.-E. Pettiti, C. Russo, A. Spielmann, J. De Meyer, N. Valticos, I. Foighel, Sir John Freeland, A.B. Baka, M.A. Lopes Rocha, J. Makarczyk, D. Gotchev, K. Jungwiert, P. Kuris, U. Lohmus, E. Levits, J. Casadevall
24 EHRR 143 - Human Rights; trans rights; (Historic) refusal to register father on birth certificate.
-
Sheffield and Horsham v United Kingdom (1999) 27 EHRR 163; [1998] ECHR 69 [judgment]
Mr R. Bernhardt (President), Mr Thór Vilhjálmsson, Mr F. Matscher, Mr A. Spielmann, Mr J. De Meyer, Mr N. Valticos, Mrs E. Palm, Mr A.N. Loizou, Mr J.M. Morenilla, Sir John Freeland, Mr M.A. Lopes Rocha, Mr L. Wildhaber, Mr J. Makarczyk, Mr K. Jungwiert, Mr P. Kūris, Mr J. Casadevall, Mr P. van Dijk, Mr T. Pantiru, Mr M. Voicu, Mr V. Butkevych
27 EHRR 163 - Human Rights; trans rights; (Historic) held that the UK's refusal to recognize gender change was not a violation.
-
Robb v Dundee City Council [2001] UKHRR 1135
Lord Cameron of Lochbroom, Lord Johnston, and Lady Paton
Human Rights; delay; excessive delay in disciplinary proceedings violated Art 6.
-
Mr L. WILDHABER, President, Mr J.-P. COSTA, Sir Nicolas BRATZA, Mrs E. PALM, Mr L. CAFLISCH, Mr R. TüRMEN, Mrs F. TULKENS, Mr K. JUNGWIERT, Mr M. FISCHBACH, Mr V. BUTKEVYCH, Mrs N. VAJIć, Mr J. HEDIGAN, Mrs H.S. GREVE, Mr A.B. BAKA, Mr K. TRAJA, Mr M. UGREKHELIDZE, Mrs A. MULARONI
Human Rights; trans rights; the ECHR ruled that the UK's failure to recognize gender reassignment violated Art 8 and 12.
-
Goodwin v United Kingdom [2002] ECHR 588 [judgment]
ECtHR Grand Chamber
Human rights; gender recognition; the failure to provide legal recognition for the gender reassignment of a post-operative transsexual violated Articles 8 and 12 of the ECHR. Led to the Gender Recognition Act 2004.
-
Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead
Gender recognition; pre-GRA case declaring that marriage law was incompatible with Art 8/12 for trans people.
-
Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30; [2004] 2 AC 557 [judgment]
Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead, Lord Steyn, Lord Millett, Lord Rodger of Earlsferry, Lady Hale
2 AC 557 - Human Rights; interpretation; s.3 HRA requires courts to read legislation compatibly with rights 'so far as is possible'.
-
Begum v Governors of Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15 [judgment]
Lord Bingham of Cornhill
Human Rights; religion; a school uniform policy prohibiting the jilbab was a proportionate interference with Art 9 rights.
-
B v A [2007] IRLR 576
The Honourable Lady Smith, Mr H Singh, Mr D G Lewis
Unfair dismissal; where an employee is dismissed for a reason involving their private life, the HRA Art 8 right is engaged.
-
Amnesty International v Ahmed [2009] ICR 1450
Lord Justice Underhill (President), MR S YEBOAH
Discrimination; the 'but for' test applies; motive is irrelevant if the reason for treatment is the protected characteristic.
-
R (on the application of G) v Governors of X School [2011] EWHC 1314 [judgment]
Lord Hope, Deputy President, Lord Walker, Lord Brown, Lord Kerr, Lord Dyson
Human Rights; fair trial; legal representation might be required in disciplinary hearings if career-ending.
-
Eweida and others v United Kingdom [2013] ECHR 37 [judgment]
David Thór Björgvinsson, President; Nicolas Bratza; Lech Garlicki; Päivi Hirvelä; Zdravka Kalaydjieva; Nebojša Vučinić; Vincent A. De Gaetano
Human Rights; religion; the right to manifest religion (wearing a cross) was violated by BA's uniform policy.
-
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700 [judgment]
Lord Sumption, Lord Neuberger
Human Rights; proportionality; established the four-stage test for justifying interference with a convention right.